A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to explain how it will enforce President Trump's executive order seeking to eliminate birthright citizenship.

The Supreme Court did not rule last week on whether President Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship was constitutional. But the court did pave the way for that order to take effect in ...

Denaturalization is a tactic heavily used during the McCarthy era and one that was expanded during the Obama administration ...

Within two hours of a Supreme Court ruling that limits the ability of federal courts to impose universal injunctions, lawyers ...

The Supreme Court’s ruling allows the President to temporarily revoke birthright citizenship; Ruth Marcus and Michael Luo ...

The Supreme Court issued a ruling in a case surrounding birthright citizenship Friday, but the decision didn't directly rule on questions surrounding the future of birthright citizenship.

Pritzker, 60, who is running for a third term in office next year, called the ruling a "dangerous sign" of Trump's ...

Voices: Birthright citizenship is deeply rooted in Black American history, and it should remain in place We must travel back in time and revisit when the 14th Amendment was created — and for ...

“So, universal birthright citizenship isn’t required by the 14th Amendment’s text or historical context. It’s inconsistent with the earliest legal interpretations of the amendment.

Trump may think that birthright citizenship is only "about the babies of slaves." But as these statements from the 1866 debates make clear, the historical evidence proves him wrong.

For 157 years, birthright citizenship has made anyone born in the United States a citizen – whether they are the child of citizens, foreign nationals living legally in the U.S. or unauthorized ...